Vulnerability management

Which vulnerabilities threaten your critical services?

Rebasoft filters out what does not apply before it reaches your team, then ranks what remains by exploitation and by the services you run on.
Vulnerability overview live
Today’s Work: ranked by exploitation and importance
1
Critical KEV Importance 7.2
SERVER_WEB_IIS · CVSS 9.8 · EPSS 0.90
Why?
2
Critical Importance 7.2
SERVER_WEB_IIS · CVSS 9.8 · EPSS 0.31
Why?
Service business-risk rankings
25% in services 75% unassigned · 3 critical hidden
Payments Importance 7.2 7 KEV
Test systems Importance 2.4 18 Critical
Unassigned — 3 critical hidden
Illustrative · weighted towards known exploitation · SLA-tracked
In the console

Today’s work, ranked

Each item shows the asset, why it ranks where it does and what to do next, from raising a ticket to requesting an exception.

From a Rebasoft demo estate. Asset names hidden. CIATV is the importance score shown in the console.
Multi-source matching

Findings come from collected evidence, with false positives already filtered

A raw CVE list leaves your team ruling out false positives by hand. Rebasoft takes the software, patch and firmware data it collects, read-only by design, and weighs NVD against the CVE List, Microsoft, distribution advisories, OSV and over 100 vendors. Each finding arrives with its sources, its rule and its status as confirmed or inferred.

Linux backports

When NVD flags sudo and Ubuntu confirms that your build carries the fix, the CVE is removed before it reaches your team. Red Hat, Debian, Oracle, SUSE and Alpine work the same way.

Windows KBs

Installed KBs subtract the CVEs they fix, and older OS-level noise is removed with them.

Network firmware

Device OS versions are matched against vendor data with no agent, and trimmed to the exact build on Cisco and Junos, which cuts the noise on your infrastructure.

Vendor “not affected” statements

A vendor statement removes the NVD match, and the reason remains visible on the finding.

Today’s Work

One ranked list, weighted towards known exploitation

Severity alone sends your team to the wrong place first. The Rebasoft score combines KEV, EPSS, CVSS, exposure class, time overdue and the importance your business services pass down. A known-exploited flaw on a web server in a critical service therefore outranks a 9.8 on a test system.

01
The reason

Each card explains why the item is on the list.

02
The next step

Each card sets out what to do next, with text for your service desk.

03
SLA state

Your team filters to breaches and records exceptions with a reason and an audit trail.

Is this one of ours?

Hot issues answer “is this one of ours?” site by site

A newly exploited flaw usually means a morning of manual checking. With Rebasoft, KEV additions, EPSS jumps and vendor-critical advisories raise a hot issue, and a single query spans installed software, past findings and network devices.

  1. 07:40

    A firewall flaw is added to KEV

    Within hours, a hot-issue card names the flaw in the console.

  2. 08:15

    The analyst opens the drawer

    For the selected site, she sees the CVEs, CVSS, the KEV date and EPSS with its seven-day rise.

  3. 08:16

    The first site reads Affected

    Each device is listed with days open and SLA state, and a second list shows devices holding the product with no open finding.

  4. 08:20

    The next site reads Can’t tell

    The card shows how much of that site has software inventory, so the position is clear.

  5. 08:25

    The report is ready

    The position for each site is available as a report, ready to schedule each morning.

A composite of real customer situations. Times are illustrative.

Closure

Installed updates close findings with no manual verification

Your team deploys the update through its usual tool, and Rebasoft confirms the KB at the next collection, closes the CVEs it fixes and records the reason. The asset is ranked again and your Cyber Essentials patching figures follow, which ends the chasing and the manual sign-off.

Evidence you can rely on

Green means checked

A scanner reports on what it reached. Rebasoft also runs discovery, so it knows which devices remain unassessed. Assets with no software evidence are shown as Not assessed and are not counted as clean.

Patching412 of 412 devices checked
Pass
Malware protection3 devices with no protection
Fail
Secure configuration38 devices unreachable: credential rejected
Not assessed
Illustrative example
Evidence-based assessment

Evidence-based assessment gives a small team more for less effort

The usual scanner approachEvidence-based assessmentWhat your team gains
How findings are madeScans run against targets on a scheduleCollected inventory is weighed against vendor, distribution and NVD dataNo scan windows to negotiate and no scanning schedule to manage
False positivesVersion matches arrive for a person to rule outBackports, installed KBs and vendor statements are applied firstA shorter list, with the reasons on each finding
CoverageA report covers what the scan reachedDiscovery names the devices that were Not assessedA clear view of coverage, in place of false assurance
PriorityBusiness context is added separatelyImportance is inherited from your business servicesWork ordered by what the organisation runs on
Common questions
How does Rebasoft differ from a vulnerability scanner?
Rebasoft derives findings from collected inventory and vendor data rather than running scans, so there is no scanning schedule to manage and your team receives a filtered, ranked list.
Does Rebasoft patch?
Your team patches with the tools it has. Rebasoft shows what to fix and confirms when it has closed, which ends manual verification.
How does this work with Microsoft Defender?
Rebasoft covers network devices and Linux as well as Windows, adds business service context, and can import Defender findings next to its own, so your team works in one place.

More questions? See the full Rebasoft FAQ — answers by topic and by role, or how Rebasoft is priced.

Bring a CVE and see whether it applies to you

In thirty minutes on a live console, you will see why a finding exists, what ranks first and how coverage is reported.